Nervous system evolution disproves evolution

The nervous system is vital for the survival of any multicellular life form to be capable of reacting to the outer and inner environment. Without it, organisms wouldn't be able to feel pain, stay away from dangers, or change vital functions such as breathing, heartbeat, digestion, and muscle control—causing death.

Pain is a warning signal that warns organisms of any danger to life. Since the nervous system has control over vital functions, improper regulation may lead to life-threatening results.

Such intricate design would mean that the nervous system may not have evolved gradually. A partially formed nervous system would not be conducive to life and must have manifested in its full glory from its inception. This is an argument against the theory of evolution in favor of intelligent design. To form a neural network, complicated structures and precise designing would be mandatory.

In living organisms, nerve cells have been seen to communicate through electrical and chemical signals, and even the least amount of error in this system often leads to the failure of the very imperative activities. The specified kind of designing of the nervous systems can only be done with intelligent design and not by any kind of selection process at random evolved overtime. This provides support for the intelligent design perspective rather than evolutionary theory.

You may also like...